Useful before impressive.

Three prototypes. Each begins with a source, a refusal condition, and a public issue tracker.

Under construction

inputpublic recordsconstraintcitation requiredoutputinspectable

Active benches

Three systems. Three refusal conditions.

A prototype earns trust by knowing when it cannot answer.

affidavit search

ask(record) → answer + citation

A citation-first interface for asking questions of sworn election records. If the source does not support an answer, it should say so.

statusspecificationrefusal“Not in the file.”Inspect issues ↗

network measurement

observe(network) → disruption?

An open measurement layer for detecting connectivity disruption from public probes. Detection first; attribution only with evidence.

statusresearchrefusal“Detects. Does not attribute.”Inspect issues ↗

document diffing

diff(statement, record)

A careful comparison of parliamentary records, public statements, and manifesto claims, rendered as source-linked document diffs.

statusscopingrefusal“No match without a source.”Inspect issues ↗

Workbench protocol

01Source first.

Every output resolves to a record a reader can inspect.

02Refusal is valid.

Missing evidence produces a gap, never plausible filler.

03Evaluation is public.

Known limits and failure cases belong beside the demo.